Sodomy 2: Will Anwar get a fair trial?

-
One after another applications made by the defense attorneys of Parliamentary Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to obtain copies of medical reports, copies of the "alleged sodomy victim" Mohd Saiful Bukhari's described report and medical examination for the purpose of review has been blatantly rejected continuously without any valid reasons.

The reason for the rejection by the court judge was these information applied by the defense are not relevant and the defense does not really require these evidence for review. That means Datuk Seri Anwar was not fairly accorded with the review and documentations of his own case. Is this a fair trial? Is he properly accorded his human rights?

Whatever applications made forward by the defense team to review documentations, information and reports related to the case for the trial were all unreasonably rejected. As such, Datuk Seri Anwar's defense were actually left defenseless as they are lack of proper or detailed documentary evidence to work out the case.

So , what is the motive of the judge of doing this against Datuk Seri Anwar? Withholding these papers so that his attorneys would not be able to file a proper defense against the prosecution? Or simply because there are no evidence at all or documentary reports are incomplete all this while, therefore they are "withholding" it to buy more time for further fabrication?

There comes another blow in the prosecution team when it has been discovered that one of the deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Farah Azlina is having an affair with Mohd Saiful (the alleged "sodomy victim" and star witness to this case).

And when Datuk Seri Anwar wanted a review on the reported Farah Azlina-Mohd Saiful affair to check on the possibility of conflict of interest and suspected confidential information were leaked out, the judge had again rejected the application citing that this affair is not related to the ongoing trial.

Why not related? It is all related. The judge is ruling in favour of the prosecution simply because they had receive the instruction from the federal government to do so. This shows that the judiciary system is still tainted. There is no transparency at all in this case right from the beginning till today.

At the end of the day, do you believe that Datuk Seri Anwar will ever get a fair trial to clear his name? Will he be fairly trialed in a professional manner and obtain an accurate and correct judgment onto his case? Will the judgment and prosecution be open and transparent when dealing with the defense team?

Whom do you all thrust in the federal government: the police, attorney-general's chamber or the judge? As far as we knew, none of these are trustworthy of. The entire system has been politicize and it is a total failure.

The entire nation and the world are watching because this is not a trial of one man alone, but the entire nation has been accused and put on trial. Democracy and justice itself are on trial.

Remember! Justice maybe blind but it can be seen in the dark.

Popular posts from this blog

EC should ask ROS to register Pakatan quickly

-
Image
The Election Commission (EC) had recently advised the current opposition pact, Pakatan Rakyat comprising PAS, PKR and DAP, to register their coalition so that they could use their logo in the coming general election. EC deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said the coalition should be registered because the opposition parties were always seen violating regulations of the election campaign, especially on the use of their logo. Datuk Wan Ahmad seems to be overly ignorant and too forgetful on this issue. The EC deputy chairman should ask the Registrar of Societies (ROS) to quickly register the Pakatan instead of calling on Pakatan to register itself. Pakatan Rakyat had earlier send in their formal application to register itself as a coalition of political parties since November 2009 and ROS has yet to register the said entity till today after delaying and creating so many hassles for more than a year. It is not Pakatan who is delaying on its application but it was the ROS who is just...
Read more

USM fiasco a shame

-
I read and heard with irritation and felt disgusted with the fiasco committed by the apex status university called Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) which caused untold anguish to the affected students and their parents. If this happened in Japan, the Vice-Chancellor would have done the honourable thing - take full responsibilty and leave, but here in Malaysia, as expected, the blame is shifted here and there, trying to make someone a scapegoat. By the way, would there be any racist or sabotage elements involved? Those who are responsible for this fiasco should be sacked or expelled immediately.
Read more

No action against YBs without speaker's consent

-
Penang assembly Speaker Law Choo Kiang said the police and attorney-general (AG) cannot prosecute any elected representatives for any wrongdoings committed in the House. Law said the authorities cannot act on the assemblypersons without the agreement of the speaker. "So this clearly cancels the (planned) charge against Seri Delima assemblyperson RSN Rayer for sedition under the 1948 Sedition Act," the PKR Bukit Tambun assemblyperson said in a statement yesterday. Law said a warning based on the assembly's standing orders has been issued to Rayer not to repeat the remark "Umno celaka" (damned Umno), which the latter allegedly uttered in the House on May 20. Based on the standing orders, the 10 disgruntled Umno assemblypersons were also told to table an emergency motion to the Penang special assembly committee to deal with their indignation over Rayer's remark, Law added. "But Umno failed to obtain enough quorum or votes for the motion, so they couldn...
Read more