MIC denied its failure, slammed critics

-
MIC vice-president Datuk M.Saravanan had recently slammed the statement made by a leader of an Indian-based chamber of commerce citing the party had failed the Malaysian Indian community.

Saravanan asked, "Who is he to condemn MIC and to claim that MIC had failed the Indian community without any facts or knowledge of the party's contribution?"

We would like to ask Saravanan, if MIC really contributes for the betterment and welfare of the Indian community at large, why did MIC failed to defend most of its seats contested in the last general elections in 2008? This means, MIC is already irrelevant in the eyes of the Indian community.

We hope Saravanan and the other MIC leaders would stop talking big about their "contributions" and start looking at themselves all over again to see if they really have any shortcomings among themselves and the party as well. There's no point for you to deny your failure as your failure has already been proven in the last general elections where even your past and present party president were defeated by the oppositions.

If MIC really contributed to the Indian community, then why the community rejected then? Do not blame the opposition for manipulating the information, because MIC being part of the government has already got all the resources and mainstream media channels to outline their contributions and to let the people know what they had done for all these years. Aren't that sufficient to back MIC up?

Furthermore, MIC claimed that they are democratic, but why refused to accept criticisms? Why are they purging dissident party members from the ranks to prevent them from rising within the party ranks? That is why MIC with all these old conservative leaders at the top there would never ever change and shall remain rotten for as long as they are still holding their respective positions.

MIC leaders are indeed failing the party and the Indian community entirely.

Popular posts from this blog

EC should ask ROS to register Pakatan quickly

-
Image
The Election Commission (EC) had recently advised the current opposition pact, Pakatan Rakyat comprising PAS, PKR and DAP, to register their coalition so that they could use their logo in the coming general election. EC deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said the coalition should be registered because the opposition parties were always seen violating regulations of the election campaign, especially on the use of their logo. Datuk Wan Ahmad seems to be overly ignorant and too forgetful on this issue. The EC deputy chairman should ask the Registrar of Societies (ROS) to quickly register the Pakatan instead of calling on Pakatan to register itself. Pakatan Rakyat had earlier send in their formal application to register itself as a coalition of political parties since November 2009 and ROS has yet to register the said entity till today after delaying and creating so many hassles for more than a year. It is not Pakatan who is delaying on its application but it was the ROS who is just...
Read more

USM fiasco a shame

-
I read and heard with irritation and felt disgusted with the fiasco committed by the apex status university called Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) which caused untold anguish to the affected students and their parents. If this happened in Japan, the Vice-Chancellor would have done the honourable thing - take full responsibilty and leave, but here in Malaysia, as expected, the blame is shifted here and there, trying to make someone a scapegoat. By the way, would there be any racist or sabotage elements involved? Those who are responsible for this fiasco should be sacked or expelled immediately.
Read more

Singapore Malay daily teaches Mahathir about hardwork

-
Image
The former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad's assumption that Malays in Singapore had failed and their neighbouring Malays should take lesson from their plight has not impressed a Singaporean daily. The republic's Malay daily Berita Harian in an editorial said Malay-Muslims in the republic state were successful and it was a result of their real efforts and hard work in line with the values of meritocracy, not a result of being spoon-fed. “We do not believe in being spoon-fed or being too dependent on the government - in other words, we do not have a crutch mentality,' wrote editor Guntor Sadali. Guntor said Singapore Malays believed that a community with such a mentality would soon become a “two M” community, which stands for ‘manja’ (spoilt), and ‘malas’ (lazy). “We definitely do not want to be labelled as a pampered and lazy community,” he said, adding that the Malay community in the island raised their own funds to build Islamic schools, mosques and other community pro...
Read more