MCA likens Mat Sabu to Ayatollah Khomeini

Khomeini was an Iranian religious and political leader who played an integral part in the Iranian Revolution that led to the overthrow of the Shah of Iran in 1979. He later became Iran’s Supreme Islamic Revolutionary Leader until his death in 1989.
So many inconsistencies in the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition now. First, Umno had aggresively branded Maohamad Sabu as a Communist following his political ceramah in Tasek Gelugor, Seberang Perai citing that the police officers killed at Bukit Kepong police station were of the colonial police force.
Then, MCA fired another salvo at Mat Sabu different from the one Umno had done it previously by saying he is more to an "Ayatollah Khomeini" type, because of his Islamic leanings, following statements by some PAS leaders that they are all for a hudud law should the party were to take control of the nation or any state in the next general election.
So, to the BN leaders, is Mat Sabu a Communist or an Islamist? He has been charged in a sessions court recently for being a Communist. In this case, is he going to be charged in the court again in another day for being an Islamist or "Ayatollah"?
It is a clear fact that the charges against Mat Sabu for being a Communist (defamation suit) initiated by Umno is a politically fabricated issue which should not have exist in the first place. It is a fact that those serving in the police force in 1950 at that time were indeed servants of the British colonial government. Malaya only achieved its independence in 1957 which is seven years later then.
If not, why did MCA suddenly came out with yet another title of "Ayatollah" for Mat Sabu without first consulting Umno as the later's Mat Sabu Communist campaign is ongoing.
It is for each other's "race represented" in the BN coalition. Umno for Communist Mat Sabu to regain support from the Malay community, while MCA's Ayatollah Mat Sabu is to regain support from the Chinese community.