MACC performing a one-sided task
When some morons from the Umno lodged a report against Selangor Mentri Besar Khalid Ibrahim on his car maintenance and his Hari Raya Qurban's contribution at the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC), the later was quick to send their team of "special task force" to interrogate Khalid.
And now, a report has been lodged against the Sarawak chief minister Taib Mahmud on his reported RM3 billion of vast business and property empire overseas. But the MACC was reluctant to initiate an investigation against him.
To add more salt to the problem, the three Sarawakians who lodged their reports at the MACC had decided to withdraw them because of some provisions in the law which prevented them from pursuing the matter further.
The question here is, why the Selangor menteri besar can be interrogated while the Sarawak chief minister can be let off just like that? Just because the Selangor one is from Pakatan Rakyat and the Sarawak is Barisan Nasional (BN).
Whatever wrongs committed by BN leaders is correct and shall remain immune from prosecutions while whatever false report were made against any Pakatan leaders were quickly investigated even if there are all untrue.
When the new head of the MACC took over, he promised to revamp the organization in order to effectively combat corruption and he also wanted to put MACC to be at the level similar to that of the Hong Kong ICAC.
How can MACC be like ICAC? MACC is also not even fit to sit together with ICAC. Not qualify at all to be with ICAC. Until today, MACC is still politically one-sided since the organization reports directly to the Prime Minister's Department instead of the Parliament where it supposed to be.
What we should do? Don't waste our time anymore. Vote out Umno and their BN component parties in the next general elections.
And now, a report has been lodged against the Sarawak chief minister Taib Mahmud on his reported RM3 billion of vast business and property empire overseas. But the MACC was reluctant to initiate an investigation against him.
To add more salt to the problem, the three Sarawakians who lodged their reports at the MACC had decided to withdraw them because of some provisions in the law which prevented them from pursuing the matter further.
The question here is, why the Selangor menteri besar can be interrogated while the Sarawak chief minister can be let off just like that? Just because the Selangor one is from Pakatan Rakyat and the Sarawak is Barisan Nasional (BN).
Whatever wrongs committed by BN leaders is correct and shall remain immune from prosecutions while whatever false report were made against any Pakatan leaders were quickly investigated even if there are all untrue.
When the new head of the MACC took over, he promised to revamp the organization in order to effectively combat corruption and he also wanted to put MACC to be at the level similar to that of the Hong Kong ICAC.
How can MACC be like ICAC? MACC is also not even fit to sit together with ICAC. Not qualify at all to be with ICAC. Until today, MACC is still politically one-sided since the organization reports directly to the Prime Minister's Department instead of the Parliament where it supposed to be.
What we should do? Don't waste our time anymore. Vote out Umno and their BN component parties in the next general elections.
