PPMM too "menderhaka"


The Malaysian Muslim Lawyers Association (PPMM) today disputed the Sultan of Pahang’s decision to commute Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarnor’s sentence, saying the ruler’s decree may not be in accordance with Islamic law.

During the Perak constitutional crisis, Pakatan Rakyat leaders questioned the Sultan of Perak's decision to recognize the Umno-led rebel state government and with an immediate response, Umno quickly labelled the Pakatan leaders as "menderhaka" and even dragged one of the leaders to court and charge him for treason.

For Kartika's case, why is Umno keeping so quiet and did not come out to protest PPMM's dispute with the Sultan of Pahang? Just because there are a lot of Umno members in PPMM and its committee. That is very certain. You name it and you get it.

Whenever anyone who are not in line with Umno and Barisan Nasional, they are all labelled as "penderhaka" or traitor, while those who are aligned with Umno are treated as nothing wrong even if they went against the decree and the decisions made by the Sultan.

It is very clear that the royal household had often being used by Umno and if any of the rulers did not toe the line of the later, they will be criticize and condemned.

Popular posts from this blog

EC should ask ROS to register Pakatan quickly

USM fiasco a shame

Federal Constitution that Safeguards the Legitimate Rights and Interest of All Malaysians