Where are the four academics and why are they afraid of the truth?
Where are those the four academics, UiTM deputy vice-chancellor and law professor Rahmat Mohamad, IIUM law associate professor Shamrahayu Abdul Aziz and Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (Usim) law lecturers, Fareed Mohd Hassan and Hisham Hanapi who had recently briefed the rulers with wrong information on the Rome Statute?
Why are those four academics so quiet and refused any response to many critics over their misinformation on the Rome Statute? Keeping so quiet or avoiding the people over their inaccurate presentation aren’t going to ease our people’s anger over their intended misinformation.
If they had really misinformed the rulers on the Rome Statute, they should come forward and apologies to the rulers and the entire nation over their misleading presentation.
As learned professionals in their profession, we wonder why did they present such misinformation to the constitutional monarch? Have they done it accidently or did they do it intentionally with a sole intent to embarrass the present government? We want to know what are their actual motive of doing so in order to clear the air over such.
If they really make such mistakes, then they should come forward and apologies to the entire nation. But if they do it with an intent to damage the reputation of the government and to sabotage our nation’s effort to ensure justice is upheld, then, all four of them should resign from their respective positions and leave the institutions they were in.
Their presentation had earlier argued that there were negative implications, particularly for Malaysia’s constitutional monarchs, of Malaysia becoming a signatory to the Statute of Rome, but until today, they have yet to prove their facts, which clause or article in the Rome Statute that had deliberately mention such negative implications and its impacts on our nation’s constitutional monarch.
Why are those four academics so quiet and refused any response to many critics over their misinformation on the Rome Statute? Keeping so quiet or avoiding the people over their inaccurate presentation aren’t going to ease our people’s anger over their intended misinformation.
If they had really misinformed the rulers on the Rome Statute, they should come forward and apologies to the rulers and the entire nation over their misleading presentation.
As learned professionals in their profession, we wonder why did they present such misinformation to the constitutional monarch? Have they done it accidently or did they do it intentionally with a sole intent to embarrass the present government? We want to know what are their actual motive of doing so in order to clear the air over such.
If they really make such mistakes, then they should come forward and apologies to the entire nation. But if they do it with an intent to damage the reputation of the government and to sabotage our nation’s effort to ensure justice is upheld, then, all four of them should resign from their respective positions and leave the institutions they were in.
Their presentation had earlier argued that there were negative implications, particularly for Malaysia’s constitutional monarchs, of Malaysia becoming a signatory to the Statute of Rome, but until today, they have yet to prove their facts, which clause or article in the Rome Statute that had deliberately mention such negative implications and its impacts on our nation’s constitutional monarch.