Ke mana MIC pergi pada mulanya?

-
Sewaktu BN masih memerintah Pulau Pinang, kerajaan negeri yang diterajui oleh Gerakan telah meluluskan penjualan tanah di Kampung Buah Pala kepada sebuah syarikat pemaju perumahan melalui Koperasi Pegawai Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang Berhad.

Persoalannya adalah mengapa sekarang barulah MIC mara ke hadapan untuk membela nasib para penduduk di kampong tersebut? Di manakah para pemimpin MIC ini khususnya Samy Vellu dan rakan-rakannya sewaktu BN masih berkuasa? Kenapa pula mereka ini tidak menyuarakan bantahan mereka pada masa itu?

Sekarang MIC dan BN telah tumbang di Pulau Pinang dan cuba pula untuk memutarbelitkan isu ini dengan menyalahkan kerajaan negeri yang diterajui oleh Pakatan Rakyat (PR) bahawa Kampung Buah Pala telah dinafikan hak asasi kemanusiaan mereka.

Dah gagal mencari penyelesaian terhadap skandal Maika Holdings Bhd untuk para pelabur dan pemegang sahamnya, MIC asyik nak campurtangan di dalam isu Kampung Buah Pala pula, kononnya nak membela para penduduk di situ. Adakah mereka membela para pelabur dan pemegang saham Maika?

Kami mempertikaikan keikhlasan mereka untuk berbuat demikian. Nak menutup skandal Maika, MIC cuba memperbesarkan isu di Kampung Buah Pala agar orang ramai akan lupa akan kes Maika. MIC mendakwa kes di Kampung Buah Pala itu lebih teruk daripada Maika. Apa yang dimaksudkan ini?

Sementara kerajaan negeri PR sekarang sedang berusaha untuk mencari jalan penyelesaian yang paling berkesan, MIC pula cuba mempolitikkan dan memburukkan keadaan sehingga menyebabkan kemarahan yang tidak dapat dikawal.

Jadi, kami ingin menasihati MIC agar jangan campurtangan di dalam isu Kampung Buah Pala ini lagi dan biarlah kerajaan negeri PR untuk menyelesaikannya dengan cara yang lebih teratur.

Selesaikanlah skandal Maika Holdings terlebih dahulu. Ianya telah berlarutan semala beberapa dekad. MIC perlu memberikan penjelasan mereka kepada semua pelabur dan pemegang saham mengenai kedudukan pelaburan dan wang mereka.

Popular posts from this blog

EC should ask ROS to register Pakatan quickly

-
Image
The Election Commission (EC) had recently advised the current opposition pact, Pakatan Rakyat comprising PAS, PKR and DAP, to register their coalition so that they could use their logo in the coming general election. EC deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said the coalition should be registered because the opposition parties were always seen violating regulations of the election campaign, especially on the use of their logo. Datuk Wan Ahmad seems to be overly ignorant and too forgetful on this issue. The EC deputy chairman should ask the Registrar of Societies (ROS) to quickly register the Pakatan instead of calling on Pakatan to register itself. Pakatan Rakyat had earlier send in their formal application to register itself as a coalition of political parties since November 2009 and ROS has yet to register the said entity till today after delaying and creating so many hassles for more than a year. It is not Pakatan who is delaying on its application but it was the ROS who is just...
Read more

USM fiasco a shame

-
I read and heard with irritation and felt disgusted with the fiasco committed by the apex status university called Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) which caused untold anguish to the affected students and their parents. If this happened in Japan, the Vice-Chancellor would have done the honourable thing - take full responsibilty and leave, but here in Malaysia, as expected, the blame is shifted here and there, trying to make someone a scapegoat. By the way, would there be any racist or sabotage elements involved? Those who are responsible for this fiasco should be sacked or expelled immediately.
Read more

Federal Constitution that Safeguards the Legitimate Rights and Interest of All Malaysians

-
Image
The provisions of the Federal Constitution are very clear. It confirmed the position of the Malay Rulers, Islam as an official religion of the federation and special position of the Malays and the natives in Sabah and Sarawak whilst recalling that those provisions balance those special positions with safeguards to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the other communities in Malaysia which also includes their right to profess and practice their religions freely without being fear of any threats or being harmed by anybody. The legitimate interests of the non-Malays and non-Muslims would include, amongst others: a) Article 153 (9) says that business or trade cannot be solely reserved only for the Malays, b) Article 3 (1) says that the official religion of the federation is Islam BUT other religions are also allowed to be practiced in peace and harmony in any part of the federation. This means, the other communities too have their fundamental legitimate rights and interest here ...
Read more